Read reviews from world’s largest community for readers. But then I show how that is not good news for liberalism, for grounding liberal political authority in a modus vivendi undermines liberalism’s aspiration to occupy a privileged normative position vis-à-vis other kinds of regimes. Modus Vivendi Liberalism book. This chapter argues that the opposition between these two sets of views—liberal moralism and modus vivendi politics—has been misconceived.

On the one hand, it argues that liberal moralists have failed both to accurately characterize and to adequately appreciate the importance of modus vivendi arrangements for political order. Free delivery on qualified orders. The most fundamental value-pluralist claim is that there are many conflicting kinds of human flourishing, some of which cannot be compared in value. How will aging and shrinking societies that need immigrants …

Read Modus Vivendi Liberalism: Theory and Practice book reviews & author details and more at

The ethical theory underpinning modus vivendi is value-pluralism. Modus vivendi is liberal toleration adapted to the historical fact of pluralism. Modus Vivendi Liberalism as a whole provides a valuable contribution to existing literature, is a starting point for future interdisciplinary research, and should stimulate a great deal of significant debate and discussion.

I argue that John Gray's modus vivendi-based justification for liberalism is preferable to the more orthodox deontological or teleological justificatory strategies, at least because of the way it can deal with the problem of diversity. Moreover, whilst Rawls envisages the modus vivendi as giving way to a stable consensus that excludes divisive issues from the political agenda (p. 148), this schema regards acceptance of the principles of political decision making as being at least partly dependent on the continued existence of a fair division of power that makes compromise a virtue. - Buy Modus Vivendi Liberalism: Theory and Practice book online at best prices in India on

So modus vivendi can save liberalism from moralism, but at cost many liberals will not be prepared to pay. A polity is grounded in a modus vivendi (MV) when its main features can be presented as the outcome of a virtually unrestricted bargaining process. Migration and the global media have mixed up all the old cultures into a hybrid brew. Is MV compatible with the consensus-based account of liberal legitimacy, i.e.

But then I